What Is the Kingdom Good News?

Jesus Teaching the Kingdom

“The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand; repent, and believe in the gospel.”

The first sentence Jesus preached names two things, and does not confuse them. The kingdom of God is at hand — and, on that account, believe the good news. The kingdom is the reign that has drawn near. The good news is the announcement of what God is doing in bringing it. They belong together, and they are not the same thing.

(One note on wording: “gospel” and “good news” translate the same Greek word, euangelion, and are used interchangeably here.)

Jehovah’s Witnesses join the two into one. What they carry from door to door is the good news of God’s Kingdom: the announcement that a heavenly government was established in the calculated year 1914 and will shortly rule the earth. That announcement is their good news and their kingdom together — one message, one date, one government. In Watchtower teaching the good news and the Kingdom define each other, and both are dated to 1914.

So two questions have to be asked, and they are asked here on one page because the Watchtower’s answer to either is its answer to both. What is the kingdom of God? And what is the good news?

Neither question is a quibble: Paul pronounces a curse, twice, on anyone who would preach a different good news (Galatians 1:8–9). Whatever else is negotiable, the content of the good news is not.

Let’s set the Watchtower’s kingdom and good news beside the kingdom Christ proclaimed and the good news the apostles actually preached, in their own words, and ask … Is the kingdom a government that began in 1914, and the good news the announcement of it, or is the kingdom the reign of Christ the King, present since the first century, and the good news that King Himself, crucified and risen for our salvation?

I invite your engagement with me on these questions. You may leave comments below, but please be sure to read our policy on commenting before doing so.

Watchtower View

Jump to the Catholic View ↓

Jehovah’s Witnesses hold a distinctive and far-reaching belief about the kingdom of God: that it is a literal government, established in heaven in October 1914, when Christ — who, on their account, had been waiting at his Father’s side since his ascension — was at last enthroned as king. From that moment, they teach, Christ has been invisibly “present,” ruling unseen from heaven while the world runs down toward Armageddon, after which God’s kingdom will be extended over a cleansed earth. On this view the kingdom is not the Church, not anything present in the first century, and not anything visible now; it is a heavenly government established in 1914 and invisible to human eyes.1

This teaching is not a peripheral matter for the Watchtower; it is foundational. The 1914 date anchors the claim that we have lived in “the last days” for over a century, that Christ’s invisible presence began then, and that in 1919 Jesus appointed the “faithful and discreet slave” — identified today with the Governing Body — over his earthly organization (The Watchtower, July 15, 2013, pp. 20–25).

The Kingdom Is the Good News

The Kingdom was the theme of Jesus’ preaching. Witnesses point out, rightly, that Jesus spoke of God’s Kingdom more than of any other subject — there are over a hundred references to the Kingdom in the four Gospels. “I must declare the good news of the kingdom of God to other cities,” Jesus said, “because for this I was sent forth” (Luke 4:43). They conclude that the Kingdom must therefore be the heart of the “good news.”2

So the good news is the announcement of that government. Because the Kingdom is a real administration born in the heavens in 1914, the “good news of the kingdom” now includes this “fresh, brand-new information” that the Kingdom has been established and will shortly act. Good news and Kingdom are not two subjects on this account but one: to preach the good news is to announce the government and its date.3

The good news is about the blessings the Kingdom will bring. The Watchtower describes it as being “about the Kingdom, or government, by God that will eliminate all wickedness and then rule over all the earth in peace” — bringing an end to war, sickness and death, and everlasting life in an earthly paradise. Jesus’ ransom sacrifice is affirmed as the basis that makes these blessings possible.4

Preaching this message is the mark of true Christianity. Witnesses apply to themselves Jesus’ words, “This good news of the kingdom will be preached in all the inhabited earth for a witness to all the nations; and then the end will come” (Matt. 24:14), holding that their global, house-to-house preaching of the Kingdom — on a scale they say is unique in history — identifies them as the people doing God’s will in the last days.5

How the Date Is Built

The calculation. The Witnesses date the destruction of Jerusalem by the Babylonians to 607 B.C.E. They read the “seven times” of King Nebuchadnezzar’s madness in Daniel 4 as a hidden prophecy of “the appointed times of the nations” (Luke 21:24) — a long period during which no king would sit on God’s earthly throne. Reckoning each “time” as a prophetic year of 360 days treated as 360 years, they multiply seven by 360 to get 2,520 years and count forward from 607 B.C.E., arriving (allowing for the absence of a year zero) at October 1914 as the moment the Gentile times ended and Christ was enthroned.6

The manner of Christ’s presence. Where the Christian Greek Scriptures speaks of the parousia of Christ — traditionally rendered his “coming” — the Watchtower’s New World Translation renders it “presence,” and interprets this as an invisible presence: Christ returned in 1914 not visibly but unseen, his royal authority detectable only by a composite “sign” of the wars, famines, earthquakes, and disorders that have marked the world since. Because the presence is invisible, its beginning could not be observed; it is known, on this view, from the chronology and from the sign.7

Endnotes
  1. On the doctrine, see “What Is God’s Kingdom?” and related chapters in What Does the Bible Really Teach? (Wallkill, NY: Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society, 2005), and The Watchtower, study edition, January 15, 2014, “100 Years of Kingdom Rule—How Does It Affect You?” The teaching is that Christ was enthroned as heavenly King in October 1914, beginning an invisible “presence” and the “last days” of the present world order. ↩
  2. See, e.g., “What Jesus Taught About God’s Kingdom,” The Watchtower / jw.org, and “Let Your Kingdom Come” (Watch Tower): “Jesus spoke more about God’s Kingdom … than he did about any other subject”; “there are more than 110 references to that Kingdom in the four Gospels.” The texts cited include Luke 4:43; 8:1; Matthew 4:23. ↩
  3. On the Kingdom as a literal heavenly government established in 1914, see “Let Your Kingdom Come” and “What Now Distinguishes the Good News to Be Preached” (Watchtower Online Library): “this good news of the kingdom” means “the fresh, brand-new information that tells of God’s established kingdom … the birth of God’s Messianic kingdom in the heavens … in 1914.” ↩
  4. “The Kingdom Good News — What Is It?” (Watchtower Online Library): “the good news is about the Kingdom, or government, by God that will eliminate all wickedness and then rule over all the earth in peace”; the Kingdom message is “news about blessings that will come to mankind … happiness, freedom from economic hardship, good government, peace and security … everlasting life.” The ransom is affirmed at, e.g., Matthew 20:28; Romans 6:23 in Watchtower literature. ↩
  5. Matthew 24:14 is the Watchtower’s key text for its global preaching work; see “This Good News of the Kingdom Will Be Preached” and “What Is the Sign of ‘the Last Days’?” (jw.org), which connect the worldwide Kingdom-preaching to the sign of the last days beginning in 1914. ↩
  6. The 1914 date is reached by dating the fall of Jerusalem to 607 B.C.E., then applying the “seven times” of Daniel 4 (reckoned as 7 × 360 = 2,520 years) as “the appointed times of the nations” (Luke 21:24). See What Does the Bible Really Teach?, appendix, “1914—A Significant Year in Bible Prophecy,” and the supporting chronology in Insight on the Scriptures (Watch Tower, 1988), art. “Chronology.” ↩
  7. The Watchtower’s rendering of parousia (παρουσια) as invisible “presence” appears in the New World Translation at Matthew 24:3 and is explained in What Does the Bible Really Teach? (2005), ch. 9. ↩

Watchtower sources checked against jw.org and the Watchtower Online Library through 7 September 2026.

Catholic View

The Catholic Church holds that the kingdom of God is not a government that began operating on a calculable date, but the reign of God, present first of all in the person of Christ the King, welcomed in the hearts of those who receive Him, and made visible now in His Church: inaugurated in His ministry, established in power by His death and resurrection, and to be revealed in glory when He comes again. It has never been absent from the earth, and it did not begin in 1914.

That Jesus preached the kingdom is granted freely; it is named well over a hundred times in the Gospels, and no one disputes that it stands at the center of His teaching.1 But the good news and the kingdom are not one thing. The kingdom is the reign that has drawn near; the good news is the announcement of what God has done to bring it, and of the King who brought it at the cost of His life. Collapse the two, and the announcement of a government takes the place the crucified and risen Lord is meant to hold.

The Kingdom Is a Person

The great surprise at the center of the good news is that the kingdom is not merely near in time; it is present in Christ Himself. Charged with casting out demons by the prince of demons, He answers: “if it is by the Spirit of God that I cast out demons, then the kingdom of God has come upon you” (Matt. 12:28). The verb is past tense. Where the King is and acts, the kingdom already is: in the healings, the forgiving of sins, the raising of the dead.

Benedict XVI put it directly: the Kingdom is not a thing, and not a geographical dominion like worldly kingdoms; it is a person, and that person is Christ. Origen had said the same by calling Him the autobasileia, the Kingdom in person.

Not Coming With Signs to Be Observed

This bears directly on any attempt to fix the kingdom’s arrival by calculation. Asked when the kingdom would come, Jesus turned His questioners away from exactly that: “The kingdom of God is not coming with signs to be observed; nor will they say, ‘Lo, here it is!’ or ‘There!’ for behold, the kingdom of God is in the midst of you” (Luke 17:20–21).

A kingdom whose coming must be computed from a chronology (seven prophetic times, a starting date in the sixth century before Christ, an arithmetic of years) is precisely the observable sign Christ said would not be given. And it lands nineteen centuries after He said the kingdom had already come upon those standing in front of Him.

The computation also fails on its own terms. Everything depends on dating the fall of Jerusalem to 607 B.C.; that destruction is one of the better-fixed dates of the ancient world, established by Babylonian chronicles, astronomical-diary tablets and dated business records, and it falls in 587 or 586. Correct the starting point and the 2,520-year reckoning arrives not at 1914 but around 1934, a year of no significance in the doctrine. Nor is 1914 the original answer, only the surviving one: the same style of calculation, applied to different prophetic spans, produced 1799, 1874, 1878, 1915 and 1925, each affirmed in its turn and revised when the predicted events failed.

All Authority Was Already Given

There is a further difficulty, and on the Watchtower’s own terms it is fatal. Before the ascension the risen Christ told the eleven, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me” (Matt. 28:18), and commissioned them on the strength of it: “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations” (Matt. 28:19–20). The ‘therefore’ is the hinge: the mission begins because the authority is already held.

If all authority was already His, nothing remained to be conferred in 1914. Matthew 28:18 does not by itself rule out later phases of Christ’s reign — Paul himself looks to a consummation when the last enemy is destroyed (1 Cor. 15:24–28) — but it denies the one thing the doctrine needs: that His kingship waited for 1914 to begin. The argument is cumulative, and it is the next three sections together that carry it. The promise closing that commission, “I am with you always, to the close of the age,” describes a King already reigning through the whole age in which the Church does its work, not one waiting in the wings until a date in the twentieth century.

The text most often offered for a delayed reign is Psalm 110:1, which Hebrews applies to Christ: He “sat down at the right hand of God, then to wait until his enemies should be made a stool for his feet” (Heb. 10:12–13). But the waiting is done at the right hand, which is the seat of a reigning king, not of a king in waiting. Peter preaches the same psalm at Pentecost as already fulfilled, “God has made him both Lord and Christ” (Acts 2:34–36), and Paul says Christ “must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet” (1 Cor. 15:25): reigning now, with the enemies subdued during the reign, not before it begins.

The Kingdom and the Church

The relationship must be stated carefully: the Church and the kingdom are neither simply identical nor wholly separate. The Church is not yet the kingdom in its final glory; that comes only at the end. But the Church is the kingdom as it exists now on earth, in the words of the Second Vatican Council, “the kingdom of Christ now present in mystery,” growing visibly through the power of God in the world.

The scriptural anchor is Christ’s charge to Peter. In the same breath in which He founds His Church (on this rock I will build my Church) He adds, “I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven” (Matt. 16:18–19). Church and kingdom are named together, the keys of the one being the keys of the other. A kingdom that began ruling invisibly in 1914 leaves those keys unaccounted for during the whole interval.

Already and Not Yet

To say the kingdom is already present is not to say it has arrived in fullness. Scripture holds both poles together everywhere. The kingdom has come upon us, and believers have already been transferred into it (Col. 1:13); yet Christ teaches His disciples to pray “thy kingdom come” (Matt. 6:10), and tells parables (the nobleman who journeys to a far country to receive a kingdom and return) precisely to teach that its consummation still lies ahead.2

The Watchtower’s scheme resolves that tension by dividing it in time: nothing, then a date, then everything. Scripture does not divide it. The kingdom grows like a mustard seed and works like leaven, from the ministry of Christ until He comes.

A Curse on “Another Gospel”

If the kingdom is not a dated government, then neither is the good news the announcement of one, and here Paul sets the stakes higher than anywhere else in his letters. Twice in two verses he pronounces the anathema on anyone, even an apostle, even “an angel from heaven,” who preaches “a gospel contrary to” the one received (Gal. 1:8–9).3 A man does not curse an angel over a matter of emphasis. The content of the good news is not adjustable.

What Paul Says His Good News Was

We are not left guessing, because Paul states it twice. At the head of Romans it is “the gospel concerning his Son … designated Son of God in power … by his resurrection … Jesus Christ our Lord” (Rom. 1:1–4).4 To the Corinthians he sets out what he received and delivered as “of first importance”: “that Christ died for our sins … that he was buried … that he was raised on the third day” (1 Cor. 15:1–5).5 Neither definition mentions a government, and neither mentions a date.

The preaching in Acts matches. What the apostles carried was “the good news about the Christ,” and that rendering is the New World Translation’s own, at Acts 5:42.6

Paul tells us a third thing: what the good news does. It is “the power of God for salvation to every one who has faith” (Rom. 1:16); it is the message through which Christ Jesus “abolished death and brought life and immortality to light” (2 Tim. 1:10). And by Paul’s day that good news had already been “preached in all creation that is under heaven” (Col. 1:23) — the rendering is the New World Translation’s own — a worldwide proclamation the apostles considered a present fact eighteen centuries before the Watchtower’s message existed to be preached. The test is open to anyone with a concordance: read every occurrence of “good news” in the New Testament and ask whether a single one announces an invisible enthronement in 1914.7 And this settles the appeal to Matthew 24:14 as the Witnesses’ identifying mark: on the New World Translation’s own rendering, the worldwide preaching Christ foretold was declared accomplished in the apostles’ lifetime — a campaign begun in nineteenth-century Pennsylvania cannot be the thing Paul said had already happened.

The invisibility itself rests on one word. The doctrine renders parousia as unseen “presence,” but in first-century Greek the term named a visible, public arrival — the state visit of a king — and Matthew 24:27 likens the parousia of the Son of Man to lightning seen “from the east … as far as the west.” The word, the discourse it appears in, and the invisible presence the Watchtower once dated to 1874 are examined on a page of their own.

A King, Not Only a Government

The difference can be put in a sentence. The Watchtower preaches good news about a government; the apostles preached good news about a King: His death for our sins, His resurrection, His Lordship, and the reconciliation He accomplished. The two are not unrelated: the King has a Kingdom and the Kingdom has a King. But which stands at the center determines what is proclaimed, and what a hearer is asked to believe in order to be saved.

Paul will not let that center drift. “We preach Christ crucified” (1 Cor. 1:23). “I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ and him crucified” (1 Cor. 2:2). “Far be it from me to glory except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ” (Gal. 6:14).8 For Paul the cross is not a transaction in the background making a future government legally possible, but the saving heart of the message.

Faith Working Through Love

What does the true good news ask of the hearer? Not the transfer of information, not membership in an organization, not a program of works performed to qualify for a future place, but “faith working through love” (Gal. 5:6), a living trust in a Person. “This is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent” (John 17:3): salvation is first of all knowing God in Christ, not relocation to a paradise.9

The Reply in Brief

The kingdom of God is the reign of God present in the person of Christ the King; that same reign received in the hearts of those who welcome Him; and that reign made visible, imperfectly but really, in His Church. It was inaugurated in His ministry, established in power at His death, resurrection and ascension, and it endures, never absent from the earth, until He comes again. Nothing in that account requires a date, and nothing in Scripture supplies one. What Daniel foretold was a kingdom set up in the days of the Roman kings that “shall never be destroyed” (Dan. 2:44), not a kingdom that would wait nineteen centuries to begin.

And the good news is not an announcement about that reign’s administration but the King Himself, crucified and risen. Putting a government in His place changes what is preached, changes what salvation is, and changes what faith is, which is precisely the kind of difference Paul refused to allow.

The full treatment (what Israel awaited in the prophets, the three dimensions of the one kingdom, the vocabulary of euangelion in its Greek and Old Testament background, and a detailed examination of the chronology behind 1914) is in the Word documents at the end of this page.


Endnotes
  1. Luke 4:43; the Kingdom is named well over a hundred times in the Gospels, and the point is granted rather than disputed. ↩
  2. 2 Corinthians 5:17–21; Colossians 1:13–20; Ephesians 2:11–13. The verb at Colossians 1:13 is aorist: the transfer has already occurred for those Paul is addressing. ↩
  3. Galatians 1:6–9. Paul pronounces the anathema twice, in vv. 8 and 9, having just said he marvels that the Galatians are turning to “a different gospel — not that there is another one.” ↩
  4. Romans 1:1–4. The genitive is one of content: the gospel concerning His Son. ↩
  5. 1 Corinthians 15:1–8. The formula Paul says he “received” and “delivered” is generally regarded as pre-Pauline, and so as evidence for the content of the preaching within a very few years of the crucifixion. ↩
  6. Acts 5:42; 8:12; 20:24. The rendering “the good news about the Christ” at Acts 5:42 is the New World Translation’s own. ↩
  7. Romans 1:16; 2 Timothy 1:9–11; Romans 15:15–16, where Paul calls his ministry to the nations “the priestly service of the gospel of God”; Colossians 1:23. The rendering “preached in all creation that is under heaven” is the New World Translation’s own at Colossians 1:23; the RSV reads “preached to every creature under heaven.” ↩
  8. 1 Corinthians 1:17–25; 2:1–2; Galatians 6:14. ↩
  9. Galatians 5:6; John 17:3. On faith that is living rather than inert, compare James 2:14–26 and the treatment on the companion page What Do We Mean by “Faith”? ↩

Summary

Questions to Answer
  • Jesus said the kingdom of God had already come upon His hearers (Matt. 12:28; Luke 17:21). How did a kingdom present in the first century become a government established in 1914?
  • The 1914 date rests on Daniel’s “seven times” counted from a 607 BCE fall of Jerusalem that no historian outside the Society accepts. If the date is wrong, what becomes of the kingdom built on it?
  • Why must the good news of the Kingdom be tied to a modern chronology the first Christians never heard of?
  • If the Kingdom began ruling invisibly in 1914, why does the New Testament proclaim it as already reigning in Christ, seated at God’s right hand (Eph. 1:20-22)?

These are the questions the Society’s own texts raise, and they deserve answers.

The Watchtower teaches that the kingdom of God began invisibly in October 1914, and that the good news is the announcement of it. Those are two claims made as one. The plain language of Christ and His apostles places the kingdom in the first century rather than the twentieth, the chronology that produces 1914 fails on its own terms, and the good news the apostles preached had a Person at its center rather than a government.

“All authority has been given to me.” The risen Christ declared it before His ascension (Matt. 28:18): a completed grant in about A.D. 33, not a promise for 1914, and He commissioned the eleven on the strength of it. Daniel saw the “son of man” receive that kingship as he came to the Ancient of Days (Dan. 7:13–14), an ascent to God’s throne, and Peter preached it as accomplished at Pentecost: God “has made him both Lord and Christ” (Acts 2:36). The verse leaves room for a consummation still ahead (1 Cor. 15:24–28); it denies that His kingship waited for 1914 to begin.

The kingdom was already present in the first century. “If it is by the Spirit of God that I cast out demons, then the kingdom of God has come upon you” (Matt. 12:28). Pressed on when it would come, Jesus warned against looking for a spectacle: “The kingdom of God is not coming with signs to be observed … the kingdom of God is in the midst of you” (Luke 17:20–21). Paul told the Colossians that God “has transferred us to the kingdom of his beloved Son” (Col. 1:13).

The chronology fails on its own terms. Everything depends on dating Jerusalem’s fall to 607 B.C.E.; the tablets, chronicles, and dated business records put it in 587 or 586. Correct the start and the 2,520 years arrive around 1934, a year of no significance in the doctrine. Daniel 4 speaks only of the seven years of Nebuchadnezzar’s madness, which the chapter itself interprets, and says nothing of Christ or of any kingdom’s timing.

A trail of revised dates. 1914 is not the original answer but the surviving one: the same style of calculation, applied to different prophetic spans, produced 1799, 1874, 1878, 1915, and 1925, each affirmed in its turn and then revised. When the generation that saw 1914 died out, “this generation” was redefined rather than the date surrendered, and since 2010 it has meant two overlapping lifetimes that nobody can measure. An invisible arrival, a hidden enthronement, and a “sign” found in every age add up to a doctrine that no observation could ever count against.

A curse on “another gospel.” Twice in two verses Paul pronounces the anathema on anyone who preaches a gospel contrary to the one received, an angel from heaven included (Gal. 1:8–9). The content of the good news is not adjustable, and Paul defines it twice: “the gospel concerning his Son … designated Son of God in power … by his resurrection” (Rom. 1:1–4), and “that Christ died for our sins … was buried … was raised on the third day” (1 Cor. 15:1–5). Even the Watchtower’s own translation renders the apostolic preaching “the good news about the Christ” (Acts 5:42).

Why the difference is not a quibble. Putting a government in place of the crucified and risen Lord changes what is preached, what salvation is, and what faith is: an administration and a date in place of “Christ crucified,” survival into an earthly paradise in place of reconciliation with God, and acceptance of a message about a government where Paul asked for “faith working through love” (Gal. 5:6). Those add up to a different gospel, and Paul would not allow another.

In short: the kingdom Jesus proclaimed came into the open, and was entrusted to a Church that has stood in the light of history ever since. “The time is fulfilled,” He said, “and the kingdom of God is at hand; repent, and believe in the gospel” (Mark 1:15). Both halves of that sentence were true when He said them.